FOR RSS

Liberal senator gets brutal responses when she explains why she's voting 'no' on Gorsuch nomination

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) gets blasted after she said she would oppose Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court nomination because of his "legalisms." (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) appears to be confused over what a judge's job is.

The liberal senator took to Twitter Friday to explain why she would be voting "no" to Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch when the full Senate gets to vote on his nomination later next month.

"Judge Gorsuch has consistently valued legalisms over real lives. I won't support his nomination," Harris tweeted Friday, linking to an op-ed she wrote for the San Francisco Chronicle detailing her decision.

In the op-ed, Harris wrote: "Judge Gorsuch’s record also shows he’s willing to favor corporations over the American people. He believes companies can impose their religious views on employees and deny women birth-control coverage. And he has been hostile toward federal agencies that protect American workers and consumers."

However, in the op-ed, Harris didn't really explain what she meant by "legalisms."

Still, during his hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, Gorsuch explained that his rulings on the Supreme Court would be based not on his personal feelings or political views, but rather the Constitution and the law — which may be what Harris says she doesn't like.

Naturally, though, Twitter had a field day with Harris' remarks:

Harris' comments are concerning given that prior to being elected to the Senate, she was attorney general of California, where her job was to uphold and defend the law.

One last thing…
Watch TheBlaze live and on demand on any device, anywhere, anytime.
try premium
Exclusive video
All Videos
Watch live and on demand on any device, anywhere, anytime.
Start a FREE Trial
Worth a look
Newsletter

Get the news that matters most delivered to your inbox.