© 2024 Blaze Media LLC. All rights reserved.
‘Scientists lie to get huge grants’: Gain-of-function research has never contributed to vaccine development, scientists say
Photo by Kate Geraghty/The Sydney Morning Herald via Getty Images

‘Scientists lie to get huge grants’: Gain-of-function research has never contributed to vaccine development, scientists say

Risky gain-of-function research has never been necessary or beneficial for vaccine development, but it has allowed scientists to collect large taxpayer-funded grants, numerous scientists told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

In virology, gain-of-function research typically involves modifying pathogens to be more infectious and lethal.

While the recent COVID outbreak cannot be verifiably and indisputably traced back to gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the controversy has encouraged more scientists to speak out against the risky experimentation.

Additionally, other confirmed lab leaks have resulted in unnecessary and avoidable outbreaks, including an anthrax leak that infected 10 American researchers in 2014 and a smallpox leak that infected Birmingham, England, residents in 1978.

Supporters of the dangerous research argue that it aids in vaccine development and allows scientists to have an edge in preventing future virus outbreaks. Critics insist that the medical benefits of gain-of-function research have never been actualized but remain only “theoretical.”

Dr. Hideki Kakeya, an engineering professor at Japan’s University of Tsukuba, told the DCNF, “As far as I know, they are all theoretical and no beneficial examples in the real world exist.”

“There is a slim chance of GoF contributing to therapeutics in the real world. It’s often the case that scientists lie to get huge grants,” Kakeya added.

Physicist Roland Wiesendanger, who specializes in nanoscience, echoed Kakeya’s concern that scientists involved in gain-of-function research received significant financial benefits.

“I am not aware of any specific benefits for the general public that have come from gain-of-function research on dangerous pathogens,” Wiesendanger stated. “There are only benefits for the scientists performing such risky research because they get a lot of taxpayers’ money for that.”

Rutgers University microbiologist Richard Ebright told the DCNF, “Gain-of-function research of concern has no — zero — civilian practical applications.”

“In particular, gain-of-function research of concern is not needed for, and does not contribute to, the development of vaccines and drugs,” Ebright continued.

According to Ebright, pharmaceutical companies are not interested in investing the large sums of money necessary to develop treatments for a virus that does not yet exist. Instead, companies focus resources on therapeutics for pathogens already impacting the public to ensure there will be demand for their product.

“Developing a therapeutic can cost up to a billion $. No one would do this for a synthetic virus that only exists in a lab,” stated Valentin Bruttel, an immunologist at the University of Wuerzburg in Germany. “The mRNA vaccine platforms were developed for other diseases and then adapted within days, so there is not even much time that can be saved by these extremely dangerous experiments.”

Want to leave a tip?

We answer to you. Help keep our content free of advertisers and big tech censorship by leaving a tip today.
Want to join the conversation?
Already a subscriber?
Candace Hathaway

Candace Hathaway

Candace Hathaway is a staff writer for Blaze News.
@candace_phx →