Watch LIVE

Horowitz: It’s time for candidates and politicians to boycott Pfizer’s toxic PAC donations

Op-ed
Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images

This is Pfizer's country. We merely live in it.

Many of us have forgotten that the impetus behind the infamous 2005 Kelo v. New London court case, in which the principle of private-use eminent domain was established for none other than Pfizer. In other words, 16 years ago, Pfizer established the principle of "your property, our choice." Now the company has established the principle of "your body, our choice." What we have witnessed the past year is that no matter how illogical, dangerous, and immoral Pfizer's mandate is on the American people, now including pushing a dangerous shot on young kids who clearly don't need to assume such risk, whatever Pfizer wants, Pfizer gets. There is a reason for it. The company has bought out the politicians in both parties.

Pfizer now has 92 lobbyists in Washington split between the two parties, not to mention high-roller PR firms to help with the (political) science. Pfizer's political action committee donated to 228 federal lawmakers at a price tag of over $4 million. Although people think of doctors and scientists when Pfizer comes to mind, the company likely has as many politicians working for it. The National Pulse found 74 known former White House staffers and staff of members and committees in Congress controlled by both parties now working for the Big Pharma god. Pfizer spent over $13 million on lobbying expenditures, not to mention buying up the airwaves to the point that news agencies cannot report a negative word about the company.

In other words, Pfizer is now strong enough that it could blatantly poison our children with myocarditis and other known and unknown side effects – with zero absolute risk reduction of COVID – and will get away with it. Pfizer's wish is not only the government's command, but its mandate on we the people. The only way to break its impervious grip over our lives and bodies is to make it taboo for any candidate to take money from the pharma giant. Conservatives must make Republican primary candidates pledge never to take money again from Pfizer as a candidate or an incumbent.

Over three decades ago, Americans for Tax Reform created the famous no-tax pledge, barring candidates who sign the document from ever voting for a net tax increase. Such a clear and simple message resulted in the GOP essentially adhering to that one promise, despite violating every other facet of conservatism for decades. Republicans are now low-tax socialists and globalists, but until the bitter end they will all support low taxes. Perhaps it's time for a "No Pfizer Pledge" in which all candidates will swear off all money, lobbying, or meeting with this barbaric organization that now has more power than any elected entity.

Even if one is a dogmatic supporter of these shots and completely ignores all of the death, destruction, and viral enhancement they have created, nobody alive can look you in the eye and suggest that the drive to inject young children is driven by any shred of morality. Putting aside the immoral FDA policy of allowing Pfizer to control its own destiny without third-party audits, the company's own data showed zero cases of serious illness in both the trial and control groups in its study of 5- to 11-year-olds. There is zero benefit against serious illness, which is the only reason to vaccinate children, especially with an experimental and novel technology that has already caused numerous heart ailments in young boys and men. Moreover, roughly half the children already got the virus in some form, making any degree of risk from the shot unjustified, yet there is no desire to subject them to testing before the shot. How can Pfizer possibly justify emergency use for an ailment that its own trial showed caused no serious illness in any young child?

Now, let's look at the safety side. Despite unprecedented cases of myocarditis among young males, Pfizer admits on page 11 of its FDA briefing document that "the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination" and that it will take five years to "evaluate long term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis." Incidentally, despite the small sample size (p. 47), one child in the study group did develop Henoch–Schönlein purpura, an immunologically mediated inflammation of the small blood vessels.

How is it moral to turn the children into de facto animal trials? Come back to us in five years and you can get authorization for your shot. Then again, we already have the result of the immoral experimentation on teenagers from the past half-year. According to one study (Hoeg et al.), "for boys 12-15 without medical comorbidities receiving their second mRNA vaccination dose," the rate of hospitalization for myocarditis was "3.7 to 6.1 times higher than their 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization risk as of August 21, 2021." That is just from one side effect! How are the executives not in jail, the shots not suspended, and politicians not completely swearing off any relationship with these companies?

It is criminal to do a trial with such a small sample size when it will likely take a million shots to even find a supposed benefit from the vaccine while there are myocarditis incidents among males every few thousand!

Incidentally, a sample size of just two young children who happened to be mistakenly given the Pfizer COVID shot at a Walgreens in Evansville, Indiana, instead of the flu shot resulted in both of them suffering from heart conditions. While it is true that those children were given the full adult dose, the fact that we saw heart issues right away from it doesn't exactly reflect positively on the entire concoction, regardless of the dose.

The signals of likely vaccine-related deaths stemming from heart conditions in young males are jarring enough to suspend these vaccines, yet they are responding to those signals by mandating them and then pushing them on even younger children. According to an analysis by the Hart Group, excess mortality in the U.K. for 15- to 19-year-olds has spiked as much as 47% above the baseline level since May 1, right around when teens and young adults began to get vaccinated. The deaths also spiked among 20- to 29-year-olds and in both groups were dominated by males. Concomitantly, they also observed "a clear rise in ambulance cardiac and respiratory arrest calls in England and ambulance calls for people becoming unconscious starting from May 2021."

The rate of increase in excess deaths among young adults, while slightly higher at the beginning of the year because of COVID (and the likely cascading effects of depression, isolation, and drugs), seemed to skyrocket during the spring and summer when younger adults were mass vaccinated. This is the trend in both Europe and the U.S.

Again, we are talking about a group of people who, to begin with, are at extremely low risk from this virus, putting aside the fact that there are much safer treatments that don't cause blood clotting and heart disorders.

Not surprisingly, sales for Pfizer's drug for treating myocarditis, Vyndamax, are up 77%.

It is simply criminal for Pfizer to be pushing this shot on children, and it is shameful for any politician to be associated with the company. Even with just 1% of adverse events being reported to VAERS, there are currently a total of 818,044 adverse events , including 117,399 reports of serious injuries and 17,128 reports of deaths from all of the COVID vaccines together.

Evidently, Pfizer believes in the adage of Karl Marx, "The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope." But it doesn't have to be this way. Not if there is at least one political party not bought out by this truly evil empire. Any takers?
Most recent
All Articles