Please verify

Watch LIVE

Google Challenges Obama Administration Over Spying Program Gag Order


"Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities."

Waiters catering a reception at the Google stand, work in front of a logo of the US search engine giant, at the Frankfurt Book Fair 21 October 2005. Google is trying to convince the publishing world to participate in its new Google print search engine which allows users to search within books online. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Google on Tuesday sharply challenged the federal government's gag order on its Internet surveillance program, citing what it described as a First Amendment right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.

The 'Google' logo is seen on a tablet screen on December 4, 2012 in Paris. Credit: AFP/Getty Images

The move came in a legal motion filed in the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and was aimed at mending Google's reputation after it was identified this month as one of nine U.S. Internet companies that gave the National Security Agency access to data on its customers. Revelations about the program, known as PRISM, by a former NSA contractor has cracked open a broader debate about the privacy of American's communications from government monitoring.

The publication of such data requests would answer questions about the number of Google users or accounts affected by U.S. intelligence activities. But it wouldn't answer more critical questions on how much data is being disclosed, including whether information belonging to Americans has been swept up into investigations on a foreign targets.

"Google's reputation and business has been harmed by the false or misleading reports in the media, and Google's users are concerned by the allegations," according to the company's motion. "Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities."

Google has previously disclosed the number of data requests it receives from civilian law enforcement.

A company statement Tuesday said that "lumping national security requests together with criminal requests - as some companies have been permitted to do - would be a backward step for our users."


Featured image via AFP/Getty


Most recent
All Articles